Action Observation Treatment for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Patients With Stroke: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the last few years, new noninvasive strategies have emerged as rehabilitative treatments for patients with stroke. Action observation treatment (AOT) is a rehabilitation approach based on the properties of the mirror neuron system with a positive impact on modifying cortical activation patterns and improving the upper limb kinematics. AOT involves the dynamic process of observing purposeful actions with the intention of imitating and then practicing those actions. In recent years, several clinical studies suggested the effectiveness of AOT in patients with stroke to improve motor recovery and autonomy in activities of daily living. However, a deeper knowledge of the behavior of the sensorimotor cortex during AOT seems to be essential. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this clinical trial, conducted in 2 neurorehabilitation centers and in patients' homes, is to investigate the effectiveness of AOT in patients with stroke, confirming the translational power of a tailored treatment. Particular emphasis will be placed on the predictive value of neurophysiological biomarkers. In addition, the feasibility and impact of a home-based AOT program will be investigated. METHODS: A 3-arm, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial will be performed by enrolling patients with stroke in the chronic stage. A total of 60 participants will be randomly allocated to receive 15 sessions of AOT with different protocols (AOT at the hospital, AOT at home, and sham AOT), 3 sessions per week. The primary outcome will be assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores. Secondary outcomes will be clinical, biomechanical, and neurophysiological assessment. RESULTS: The study protocol is part of a project (project code GR-2016-02361678) approved and funded by the Italian Ministry of Health. The study began with the recruitment phase in January 2022, and enrollment was expected to end in October 2022. Recruitment is now closed (December 2022). The results of this study are expected to be published in spring 2023. Upon completion of the analyses, we will examine the preliminary effectiveness of the intervention and neurophysiological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 different AOT scenarios (ie, AOT at the hospital and AOT at home) in patients with chronic stroke and to assess the predictive value of neurophysiological biomarkers. Specifically, we will attempt to induce the functional modification of the cortical components by exploiting the features of the mirror neuron system, demonstrating relevant clinical, kinematic, and neurophysiological changes after AOT. With our study, we also want to provide, for the first time in Italy, the AOT home-based program while assessing its feasibility and impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04047134; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04047134. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/42094.

Virtual Coaching for Rehabilitation: The Participatory Design Experience of the vCare Project.

End-user involvement constitutes an essential goal during the development of innovative solution, not only for the evaluation, but also in codesign, following a user-centered strategy. Indeed, it is a great asset of research to base the work in a user-centered approach, because it allows to build a platform that will respond to the real needs of users. The aims of this work are to present the methodology adopted to involve end-users (i.e., neurological patients, healthy elderly, and health professionals) in the evaluation of a novel virtual coaching system based on the personalized clinical pathways and to present the results obtained from these preliminary activities. Specific activities involving end-users were planned along the development phases and are referred to as participatory design. The user experience of participatory design is constituted by the two different phases: the "end-user's perspective" phase where the user involvement in experiential activities is from an observational point of view, whereas the "field study" phase is the direct participation in these activities. Evaluation tools (i.e., scales, questionnaires, and interviews) were planned to assess different aspects of the system. Thirty patients [14 with poststroke condition and 16 with Parkinson's disease (PD)], 13 healthy elderly, and six health professionals were enrolled from two clinical centers during the two phases of participatory design. Results from "end-user's perspective" phase showed globally a positive preliminary perception of the service. Overall, a positive evaluation (i.e., UEQ median score > 1) was obtained for each domain of the scale in both groups of patients and healthy subjects. The evaluation of the vCare system during the "field study" phase was assessed as excellent (>80 points) from the point of view of both patients and health professionals. According to the majority of patients, the rehabilitation service through the solution was reported to be interesting, engaging, entertaining, challenging and useful for improving impaired motor functions, and making patients aware of their cognitive abilities. Once refined and fine-tuned in the aspects highlighted in the this work, the system will be clinically tested at user's home to measure the real impact of the rehabilitative coaching services.

Validation and Reliability of a Novel Vagus Nerve Neurodynamic Test and Its Effects on Heart Rate in Healthy Subjects: Little Differences Between Sexes.

BACKGROUND: The vagus nerve (VN), also called the pneumogastric nerve, connects the brainstem to organs contained in the chest and abdomen. Physiologically, VN stimulation can rapidly affect cardiac activity and heart rate (HR). VN neuropathy can increase the risk of arrhythmias and sudden death. Therefore, a selective test of VN function may be very useful. Since peripheral neurodynamic tests (NDT) are reliable for the assessment of neuropathies in somatic nerves, we aimed to validate a novel NDT to assess VN activity, namely, the VN-NTD. METHODS: In this cross-sectional double-blind, sex-balanced study, 30 participants (15 females) completed a checklist of autonomic dysfunction symptoms. During the VN-NDT administration, HR and symptoms (i.e., mechanical allodynia) were monitored in parallel to a real-time ultrasonography imaging (USI) and motion capture analysis of the neck. The VN-NDT impact on HR and its accuracy for autonomic symptoms reported in the last 7 days were tested. RESULTS: The VN-NDT induced a significant HR reduction of about 12 and 8 bpm in males and females [t(1, 119) = 2.425; p < 0.017; ηp 2 = 0.047, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-9.18], respectively. No adverse events were observed during VN-NDT. A substantial interexaminer agreement between the evaluators in symptoms induction by VN-NDT was detected [F(1, 119) = 0.540; p = 0.464; ηp 2 = 0.005, low effect]. Notably, mechanical allodynia accuracy for gastrointestinal dysfunctions was excellent (p < 0.05; 95% CI: 0.52-0.73; p < 0.001; 95% CI: 0.81-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The novel VN-NDT is a valid and accurate test capable of detecting VN activation with high sensitivity. Data provided are suitable for both sexes as a hallmark of HR variation due to VN normal response. The proposed VN-NDT may be reliable as daily routine neurological examination tests for the evaluation of neuropathic signs related to neuroinflammation of the VN. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04192877.